Blog Roll

Recommended Reading

« Israel Rejects UNSCR as Unsatisfactorily Weak; New Offensive is Underway | Main | Hezbollah Position Unclear; UNSCR Meaningless Unless Rocket Attacks End »

Vital Perspective Exclusive: Leaked Copy of the Security Council Resolution

Vital Perspective exclusive: We have obtained a copy of the draft Security Council resolution to be presented for a vote in New York, possibly as early as tonight. This, to our knowledge, is the first outlet to present it publicly. It is presented below:


UNSC DRAFT RESOLUTION LEBANON / PROJET DE RESOLUTION LIBAN

The Security Council,

Recalling all its previous resolutions on Lebanon, in particular resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978), 520 (1982), 1559 (2004), 1655 (2006) 1680 (2006) and 1697 (2006), as well as the statements of its President on the situation in Lebanon, in particular the statements of 18 June 2000 (S/PRST/2000/21), of 19 October 2004 (S/PRST/2004/36), of 4 May 2005 (S/PRST/2005/17) of 23 January 2006 (S/PRST/2006/3) and of 30 July 2006 (S/PRST/2006/35),

Expressing its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel since Hizbollah's attack on Israel on 12 July 2006, which has already caused hundreds of deaths and injuries on both sides, extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons,

Emphasizing the need for an end of violence, but at the same time emphasizing the need to address urgently the causes that have given rise to the current crisis, including by the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers,

Mindful of the sensitivity of the issue of prisoners and encouraging the efforts aimed at urgently settling the issue of the Lebanese prisoners detained in Israel,

Welcoming the efforts of the Lebanese Prime Minister and the commitment of the government of Lebanon, in its seven-point plan, to extend its authority over its territory, through its own legitimate armed forces, such that there will be no weapons without the consent of the government of Lebanon and no authority other than that of the government of Lebanon, welcoming also its commitment to a UN force that is supplemented and enhanced in numbers, equipment, mandate and scope of operation, and bearing in mind its request in this plan for an immediate withdrawal of the Israeli forces from Southern Lebanon,

Determined to act for this withdrawal to happen at the earliest,

Taking due note of the proposals made in the seven-point plan regarding the Shebaa farms area,

Welcoming the unanimous decision by the government of Lebanon on 7 August 2006 to deploy a Lebanese armed force of 15,000 troops in South Lebanon as the Israeli army withdraws behind the Blue Line and to request the assistance of additional forces from UNIFIL as needed, to facilitate the entry of the Lebanese armed forces into the region and to restate its intention to strengthen the Lebanese armed forces with material as needed to enable it to perform its duties,

Aware of its responsibilities to help secure a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution to the conflict,

Determining that the situation in Lebanon constitutes a threat to international peace and security,

1.  Calls for a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hizbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations;

2.  Upon full cessation of hostilities, calls upon the government of Lebanon and UNIFIL as authorized by paragraph 11 to deploy their forces together throughout the South and calls upon the government of Israel, as that deployment begins, to withdraw all of its forces from Southern Lebanon in parallel;

3. Emphasizes the importance of the extension of the control of the government of Lebanon over all Lebanese territory in accordance with the provisions of resolution 1559 (2004) and resolution 1680 (2006), and of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, for it to exercise its full sovereignty, so that there will be no weapons without the consent of the government of Lebanon and no authority other than that of the government of Lebanon;

4.  Reiterates its strong support for full respect for the Blue Line;

5.  Also reiterates its strong support, as recalled in all its previous relevant resolutions, for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized borders, as contemplated by the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement of 23 March 1949;

6.  Calls on the international community to take immediate steps to extend its financial and humanitarian assistance to the Lebanese people, including through facilitating the safe return of displaced persons and, under the authority of the Government of Lebanon, reopening airports and harbours, consistent with paragraphs 14 and 15, and calls on it also to consider further assistance in the future to contribute to the reconstruction and development of Lebanon;

7.  Affirms that all parties are responsible for ensuring that no action is taken contrary to paragraph 1 that might adversely affect the search for a long-term solution, humanitarian access to civilian populations, including safe passage for humanitarian convoys, or the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons, and calls on all parties to comply with this responsibility and to cooperate with the Security Council;

8.  Calls for Israel and Lebanon to support a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution based on the following principles and elements:

    • full respect for the Blue Line by both parties,
    • security arrangements to prevent the resumption of hostilities, including the establishment between the Blue Line and the Litani river of an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons other than those of the government of Lebanon and of UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11, deployed in this area,
    • full implementation of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, and of resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006), that require the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, so that, pursuant to the Lebanese cabinet decision of July 27, 2006, there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than that of the Lebanese state,
    • no foreign forces in Lebanon without the consent of its government,
    • no sales or supply of arms and related materiel to Lebanon except as authorized by its government,
    • provision to the United Nations of all remaining maps of land mines in Lebanon in Israel's possession;

9. Invites the Secretary General to support efforts to secure as soon as possible agreements in principle from the Government of Lebanon and the Government of Israel to the principles and elements for a long-term solution as set forth in paragraph 8, and expresses its intention to be actively involved;

10. Requests the Secretary General to develop, in liaison with relevant international actors and the concerned parties, proposals to implement the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, and resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006), including disarmament, and for delineation of the international borders of Lebanon, especially in those areas where the border is disputed or uncertain, including by dealing with the Shebaa farms area, and to present to the Security Council those proposals within thirty days;

11. Decides, in order to supplement and enhance the force in numbers, equipment, mandate and scope of operations, to authorize an increase in the force strength of UNIFIL to a maximum of 15,000 troops, and that the force shall, in addition to carrying out its mandate under resolutions 425 and 426 (1978):

a. Monitor the cessation of hostilities;

b. Accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the South, including along the Blue Line, as Israel withdraws its armed forces from Lebanon as provided in paragraph 2;

c. Coordinate its activities related to paragraph 11 (b) with the Government of Lebanon and the Government of Israel;

d. Extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons;

e. Assist the Lebanese armed forces in taking steps towards the establishment of the area as referred to in paragraph 8;

f. Assist the government of Lebanon, at its request, to implement paragraph 14;

12. Acting in support of a request from the government of Lebanon to deploy an international force to assist it to exercise its authority throughout the territory, authorizes UNIFIL to take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilized for hostile activities of any kind, to resist attempts by forceful means to prevent it from discharging its duties under the mandate of the Security Council, and to protect United Nations personnel, facilities, installations and equipment, ensure the security and freedom of movement of United Nations personnel, humanitarian workers, and, without prejudice to the responsibility of the government of Lebanon, to protect civilians under imminent threat of physical violence;

13. Requests the Secretary General urgently to put in place measures to ensure UNIFIL is able to carry out the functions envisaged in this resolution, urges Member States to consider making appropriate contributions to UNIFIL and to respond positively to requests for assistance from the Force, and expresses its strong appreciation to those who have contributed to UNIFIL in the past;

14. Calls upon the Government of Lebanon to secure its borders and other entry points to prevent the entry in Lebanon without its consent of arms or related materiel and requests UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11 to assist the Government of Lebanon at its request;

15. Decides further that all states shall take the necessary measures to prevent, by their nationals or from their territories or using their flag vessels or aircraft,

(a) the sale or supply to any entity or individual in Lebanon of arms and related materiel of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment, paramilitary equipment, and spare parts for the aforementioned, whether or not originating in their territories, and

(b) the provision to any entity or individual in Lebanon of any technical training or assistance related to the provision, manufacture, maintenance or use of the items listed in subparagraph (a) above,

except that these prohibitions shall not apply to arms, related material, training or assistance authorized by the Government of Lebanon or by UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11;

16. Decides to extend the mandate of UNIFIL until 31 August 2007, and expresses its intention to consider in a later resolution further enhancements to the mandate and other steps to contribute to the implementation of a permanent ceasefire and a long-term solution;

17. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Council within one week on the implementation of this resolution and subsequently on a regular basis;

18. Stresses the importance of, and the need to achieve, a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, based on all its relevant resolutions including its resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 and 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973;

19. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341da99d53ef00d8342a231653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vital Perspective Exclusive: Leaked Copy of the Security Council Resolution:

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? WRONG WRONG WRONG. OUR ONLY HOPE IS HEZB'ALLAH WILL REFUSE AND SAVE THE FREE WORLD FROM OURSELVES (like Yasse... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR THE UNITED STATES. WRONG WR... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR THE UNITED STATES. WRONG WR... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR THE UNITED STATES. WRONG WR... [Read More]

» Short Note from Joe's Dartblog
Paul Mirengoff has posted his first reactions to news that the United States and France are back to collaboration, and have a war-ending Security Council resolution in hand. Vital Perspective lets you read the resolution itself. Paul is exactly right:... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR THE UNITED STATES. WRONG WR... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR THE UNITED STATES. WRONG WR... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» Measuring Olmert for a political shroud from Kesher Talk
Vital Perspective has the text of the resolution. So does the Corner, where there is some parsing of it if you scroll up and down. John Podhoretz thinks Olmert is being measured for a political shroud. His nephew, an IDF... [Read More]

» Measuring Olmert for a political shroud from Kesher Talk
Vital Perspective has the text of the resolution. So does the Corner, where there is some parsing of it if you scroll up and down. John Podhoretz thinks Olmert is being measured for a political shroud. His nephew, an IDF... [Read More]

» The UN's idea of peace from Security Watchtower
The Security Council agreed unanimously tonight to adopt a resolution aimed at ending the conflict in Lebanon. The Security Council voted tonight to halt the deadly conflict that has engulfed Lebanon and northern Israel for the past month, passing a re... [Read More]

» The UN's idea of peace from Security Watchtower
If we are going to fight this war at our boarding gates, and not the gates of our enemies' cities, we're on our way to losing this war. [Read More]

» Leaked Ceasefire Text from Blog-o-Fascists
Solomonia Vital Perspective has the leaked text of a UN cease-fire resolution. [As I type this, CNN alerts that the re... [Read More]

» Measuring Olmert for a political shroud from Kesher Talk
[ Is anyone but me now wondering what Olmert agreed to in advance to secure the robust support not only from the US, but from Britain's Tony Blair. Because it is hard to imagine why Blair of all people would... [Read More]

» Diplomacy and the Hounds of Hell, Part XXV from A Blog For All
My question to Sec. State Rice is don't we already know who's for peace and who's for pieces? Hizbullah wants to destroy Israel, and this ceasefire only delays Israel's ability to destroy a mortal enemy. [Read More]

» Measuring Olmert for a political shroud from Kesher Talk
[ Is anyone but me now wondering what Olmert agreed to in advance to secure the robust support not only from the US, but from Britain's Tony Blair. Because it is hard to imagine why Blair of all people would... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CASTING THE VOTE FOR T... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
**UPDATED SCROLL***I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CAS... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
**UPDATED SCROLL***I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CAS... [Read More]

» NO TO UN CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION from Atlas Shrugs
**UPDATED SCROLL***I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THE U.S. WOULD AGREE TO A CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION. WHY WOULD THE U.S. GIVE IRAN MORE TIME TO REARM THEIR FOREIGN LEGIONS? IT IS NO SURPRISE TO ME THAT IT WILL BE THE STATE DEPARTMENT INFECTED CONDI NOT BOLTON CAS... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 14 August 2006 from Winds of Change.NET
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 14 August 2006 from Security Watchtower
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday & Friday. Monday's Winds of War brie... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 14 August 2006 from Winds of Change.NET
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 14 August 2006 from Security Watchtower
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday & Friday. Monday's Winds of War brie... [Read More]

Comments

Is this Chapter 7 (enforceable by military means)? Or just Chapter 6 (only looks for negotiations)?

The characterizations of Chapter VII and Chapter VI are more nuanced than that, but OK for the sake of argument. This is a Chapter VI resolution.

Leaked Copy of the Security Council Resolution
Vital Perspective exclusive: We have obtained a copy of the draft Security Council resolution I am setting a time-line for 1701.

Can anyone tell me at what time on August 11 was the draft leaked?

Eli --

We can look up what time we posted the document, but why the strange question?

Eli --

Sorry, should have read your comment more carefully... a timeline I see...

Well I can tell you this, the post went 'live' at 16:24 in Washington DC. Now the UNSCR had to be typed and then checked for any errors and/or omissions from the text provided to us. That being said, if I had to give an estimate, my colleague and I likely received the document at about 16:00.

Hope that helps. Thanks for your readership and when you have the timeline together, please let us know. We'd love to take a look.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Sign Up For Daily Email

Contact Us

Syndication

  • RSS
  • Rojo
  • Bloglines
  • Yahoo
  • Google feed
  • Pluck
  • Newsgator

September 2007

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Blog powered by TypePad

Middle East Map

  • Click to Enlarge

Praise for Vital Perspective

  • "If there were just a hint more thinking like this in Washington, prosecuting and decisively winning the War on Terror would not be the 'controversy' some choose to make it…at the cost of National Security"

    -Threats Watch

     

    "Check out Vital Perspective"

    -Instapundit

     

    "I can't keep up with these guys!"

    -Meryl Yourish

     

    "The smart boys over at Vital Perspective always have their ears to the ground picking up the latest news in the Middle East"

    -All Things Beautiful

     

    "The Instapundit on the Middle East"

    -Le Mont De Sisyphe

     

    "One of the keenest blogs on all the Internet"

    -Joe's Dartblog

     

    "One of the top sites on the web"

    -Power Line

     

    "Man, Vital Perspective is a great blog!"

    -PoliPundit

     

    "A fascinating foreign policy blog"

    -The Washington Post

Site Meter / TTLB



We Support

  • 9/11 Tribute
  • NEFA
  • Genocide
  • Witness
  • Israel
  • Denmark
  • Terrorist Media
  • Free Lebanon